Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an addition made under section 68 for cash deposits could be sustained when the assessee's cash sales were supported by books and related records and the books of account were not rejected.
Analysis: The assessee produced supporting material including stock register, VAT returns, sales invoices, cash book, bank statement and comparative sales data to explain the cash deposits as recorded cash sales. The addition was made by doubting the source of deposits without rejecting the books of account. On the facts found, the cash deposits were broadly in line with the assessee's cash sales position, and the deeming addition under section 68 could not be sustained in the absence of rejection of books and without dislodging the recorded sales evidence.
Conclusion: The addition under section 68 was not sustainable and was deleted, in favour of the assessee.