Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Section 9 application was liable to be rejected in view of the pre-existing dispute raised by the corporate debtor before issuance of the demand notice and the record of dispute reflected in the information utility.
Analysis: The corporate debtor had communicated the existence of disputes before the demand notice and again replied to the notice disputing the claim. The record from the information utility also showed the debt as disputed. Under the statutory scheme governing initiation of corporate insolvency by an operational creditor, the adjudicating authority must reject the application where notice of dispute has been received or where there is a record of dispute in the information utility. Applying the settled test that the dispute must be a real and plausible one, and not a spurious or illusory defence, the materials on record showed a genuine pre-existing dispute rather than a moonshine objection.
Conclusion: The Section 9 application was not maintainable and ought to have been rejected.