Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the delay in filing the statutory appeal should be condoned and the petitioners should be permitted to file a fresh appeal to be decided on merits without rejection on limitation.
Analysis: The issue was treated as covered by earlier co-ordinate Bench decisions on the same limitation question under section 107 of the RGST Act, 2017 and the CGST Act, 2017. The parties were ad idem that the matters could be disposed of in the same terms. The Court also took note of the Supreme Court decision permitting such relief and accepted the request to keep all contentions open before the appellate authority. The petitioners did not press any further prayer.
Conclusion: The delay in filing the appeal was condoned and the petitioners were permitted to file a fresh appeal within the stipulated time, to be considered on merits without objection on limitation. The petitioners were thus granted relief.
Final Conclusion: The writ petitions were disposed of with liberty to pursue the appellate remedy on merits, and the limitation bar was directed not to defeat consideration of the appeals if filed within time.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the limitation issue in filing a statutory GST appeal stands covered by binding precedent and the court finds it to preserve the assessee's right to an adjudication on merits, delay may be condoned and the appeal directed to be entertained without deciding limitation against the assessee.