Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether consideration received on surrender of tenancy rights is taxable under the head "Capital Gains" or can be brought to tax under the residuary head "Income from Other Sources".
Analysis: Tenancy rights are capital assets and surrender of such rights gives rise to a capital receipt. The receipt, if chargeable at all, falls within the scheme of capital gains. The absence or non-acceptance of the claimed cost of acquisition does not permit the Revenue to re-characterise the receipt under the residuary head. A capital receipt arising from transfer or extinguishment of a capital asset cannot be taxed under section 56 merely because the computation under the capital gains provisions is disputed or fails on the facts.
Conclusion: The addition made under the head "Income from Other Sources" was rightly deleted, and the Revenue's challenge fails.
Ratio Decidendi: A receipt arising from surrender of tenancy rights, being a capital receipt from transfer of a capital asset, cannot be taxed under the residuary head of income even if the cost of acquisition is not satisfactorily established.