Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether service of notice on the PAN and passport address of an NRI assessee was sufficient, and whether the reassessment order and consequential demand and penalty proceedings could survive when no notice was actually served and no hearing was afforded.
Analysis: The Court held that, in the case of an NRI, service or attempted service at the address available in the PAN or passport is sufficient compliance in normal circumstances, and the Assessing Officer cannot be expected to trace the assessee's bank address in the absence of such particulars with the Department. The Court also accepted that the plea of alternative remedy did not prevent interference in the peculiar facts, particularly where the assessee had approached the Court after obtaining knowledge of the order and the proceedings disclosed serious procedural infirmities. The record further showed lack of proper service and denial of an effective opportunity of hearing, including in the rectification proceedings.
Conclusion: The reassessment order, the consequential demand and penalty orders, and all further proceedings were quashed and set aside. Fresh notice and continuation of proceedings were left open in accordance with law, and the assessee was not permitted to object on limitation grounds to such fresh notice.