Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the adjudication and rectification orders were liable to be quashed for breach of natural justice, non-consideration of the reply to the show-cause notice, and absence of a personal hearing.
Analysis: The record showed that the petitioner had indicated a desire for personal hearing in the reply to the show-cause notice, yet the adjudication order proceeded on the erroneous footing that no reply had been filed and no hearing was sought or granted. The rectification order acknowledged receipt of the reply but did not disclose that any personal hearing was afforded before correcting the order. In these circumstances, the orders reflected mechanical adjudication, absence of independent application of mind, and failure to deal with the explanation offered in reply. Such defects rendered the orders unsustainable.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were quashed and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after granting reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.