Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty under section 271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could survive after the quantum additions forming its basis had been quashed.
Analysis: The quantum assessment giving rise to the additions was already set aside in the assessee's case. Once the foundational additions ceased to exist, the penalty initiated on that basis could not independently survive. The decision relied on the principle that where the primary assessment itself is annulled, the satisfaction and basis for penalty proceedings linked to it also fall away.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 271D did not survive and the Revenue's challenge to its deletion failed.