Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported product Reformate was classifiable under Tariff Item 2710 12 19 as claimed by the Revenue or under Tariff Item 2707 50 00 as claimed by the appellant.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the correct tariff classification of Reformate. The earlier decision involving identical imports of Reformate had held that the product fell under CTH 2707 50 00, and that view had been carried in appeal to the Supreme Court, where the appeal was dismissed without interference. The Tribunal treated the earlier final order as having merged with the Supreme Court's disposal and held that, in respect of identical goods imported during the relevant period, the classification issue could not be reopened merely on the basis of different observations in the present adjudication. On that footing, the Revenue's classification under CTH 2710 12 19 was not accepted.
Conclusion: Reformate was held classifiable under CTH 2707 50 00 and not under CTH 2710 12 19.