Realisation of investments and intention to trade determine whether share gains are business income or capital accretion.

Realisation of ordinary investments is not taxable as business profit unless the dealings amount to trading or an adventure in the nature of trade. The note explains that the decisive test is the assessee's intention, as gathered from the totality of circumstances, including the nature of the original holdings, continued acquisition of similar assets, and whether the assets were treated as stock-in-trade. On the facts discussed, the transactions reflected conversion and reinvestment of investments rather than share dealing, so the resulting surplus retained a capital character and was not assessable as business income.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether there were materials on record to support the finding that the assessee was not a dealer in shares and securities during the assessment years in question; (ii) Whether the profits and losses arising from the sale of shares, securities, preference shares and debentures could be taxed as business profits.

Issue (i): Whether there were materials on record to support the finding that the assessee was not a dealer in shares and securities during the assessment years in question.

Analysis: The assessee's investments were originally in Government securities, debentures and preference shares, and the surrounding facts showed a gradual conversion of holdings into Tata ordinary shares. The sales of some scrips at a loss, the continued acquisition of Tata ordinary shares, and the absence of any sale of Tata ordinary shares supported the view that the assessee was changing the character of his investments rather than trading in them. The determining factor was the intention with which the shares were acquired and dealt with, gathered from the totality of circumstances.

Conclusion: The finding that the assessee was not a dealer in shares and securities was supported by material on record, and the answer was in the affirmative.

Issue (ii): Whether the profits and losses arising from the sale of shares, securities, preference shares and debentures could be taxed as business profits.

Analysis: Surpluses arising on the realisation of ordinary investments are not taxable as business profits unless the transactions amount to the carrying on of a business or an adventure in the nature of trade. On the facts found, the assessee was realising existing investments and reinvesting the proceeds with a view to better investment, not holding the assets as stock-in-trade or selling them for trading profit. The gains therefore retained the character of capital accretion.

Conclusion: The profits and losses from the sales could not be taxed as business profits, and the answer was in the negative.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the assessee, holding that the transactions represented conversion and realisation of investments and not taxable trading activity.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee merely realises or converts ordinary investments with the object of better investment, the resultant surplus is capital in nature and not assessable as business income unless the transactions form part of a trading adventure.

---