Section 50C does not apply to stock-in-trade; real estate inventory claim and connected penalties sent back for fresh consideration.

Section 50C applies only to transfers of capital assets for capital gains computation and does not govern sites held as stock in trade or business inventory. The Tribunal therefore required factual verification of the assessee's claim that the sites were part of a real estate business, with the Assessing Officer directed to examine books of account, land records and supporting material afresh. Because the quantum issue was restored for de novo consideration, the connected penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271(1)(c) were also remitted for fresh decision after reasonable opportunity to the assessee.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether section 50C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applied to the transfer of the sites sold by the assessee, or whether the matter required verification of the assessee's claim that the sites were held as business inventory in the course of real estate business; (ii) Whether the penalty matters under sections 271D and 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 required fresh adjudication in view of the remand of the quantum issue.

Issue (i): Whether section 50C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applied to the transfer of the sites sold by the assessee, or whether the matter required verification of the assessee's claim that the sites were held as business inventory in the course of real estate business

Analysis: Section 50C operates in the field of computation of capital gains and applies where consideration is received or accruing as a result of transfer of a capital asset. If the lands or sites were held as stock in trade or business inventory in the ordinary course of a real estate business, the transfer would fall under business income and the deeming fiction in section 50C would not apply. The assessee, however, had not established before the lower authorities, with supporting books and records, that the sites formed part of business inventory. The claim therefore required factual verification by the Assessing Officer, along with examination of books of account, land records and other supporting material.

Conclusion: The issue was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination. If the sites are found to be business inventory held in the course of real estate business, section 50C will not apply and the addition is to be deleted.

Issue (ii): Whether the penalty matters under sections 271D and 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 required fresh adjudication in view of the remand of the quantum issue

Analysis: The penalty matters arose from the same set of facts and the quantum determination was sent back for fresh consideration. In such circumstances, the penalty issues could not be finally sustained or reversed without the outcome of the restored quantum proceedings. Fresh decision-making by the Assessing Officer after giving reasonable opportunity was therefore necessary.

Conclusion: The penalty matters were also remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision in accordance with law.

Final Conclusion: The appeals were disposed of by restoring the core quantum dispute and the connected penalty issues to the Assessing Officer for de novo consideration, with directions to grant the assessee a reasonable opportunity and to decide the applicability of section 50C on the basis of proper evidence.

Ratio Decidendi: Section 50C applies only to transfers of capital assets for capital gains computation and does not govern transfers of stock in trade or business inventory.

---