Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the blocking of input tax credit under Rule 86-A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 could be sustained when the electronic credit ledger had a negative balance and the statutory preconditions for invocation of the power were not satisfied.
Analysis: The power under Rule 86-A is confined to blocking use of credit available in the electronic credit ledger, and its exercise depends on satisfaction of the prescribed conditions, including formation of the requisite opinion on fraudulently availed or ineligible credit. On the facts, the ledger reflected a negative balance, so there was no available credit to block. In those circumstances, the impugned blocking exceeded the scope of Rule 86-A and could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The blocking of input tax credit was invalid and the negative balance was directed to be restored to the extent of Rs. 1.42 crores.
Ratio Decidendi: Rule 86-A permits blocking only of credit available in the electronic credit ledger, and the power cannot be exercised where no such available credit exists.