Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment notice issued under section 148 was invalid for want of approval from the competent authority under section 151(ii), and whether the reassessment proceedings based on such notice were liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The approval recorded for the notice and the order under section 148A(d) was by the PCIT, whereas for a notice issued after expiry of three years from the end of the relevant assessment year, the statute required approval from the specified higher authority. Sanction under section 151(ii) is a jurisdictional safeguard and not a procedural formality. Once approval is granted by an authority not prescribed by the statute, the very assumption of jurisdiction to issue the notice under section 148 is vitiated, and all consequential proceedings cannot survive.
Conclusion: The reassessment notice was invalid for want of proper approval under section 151(ii), and the reassessment proceedings were quashed, in favour of the assessee.