Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment notice and consequential reassessment were valid when prior approval for issue of notice beyond three years was granted by the Principal Commissioner instead of the authority prescribed under section 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The notice under section 148 was issued beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year, attracting the higher sanction contemplated by section 151. The record showed that approval was granted by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, whereas the statute required approval by the specified higher authority. The defect was treated as one going to the root of jurisdiction and not as a curable irregularity. On that basis, the reassessment notice was held to be bad in law and the consequential reassessment could not survive. The merits of the additions were therefore not examined.
Conclusion: The reassessment was invalid for want of competent approval under section 151, and the assessee succeeded on the jurisdictional challenge.