Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to immediate zimma/release of the seized articles, or should first seek provisional release before the Investigating Officer under the applicable GST procedure.
Analysis: The prayer concerned seized electronic devices and documents. The applicable framework relied upon was Section 67(6) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which permits provisional release of seized goods on execution of bond and furnishing of security or on payment of tax, interest and penalty, as prescribed. In view of that statutory mechanism, and since the petitioner had not first approached the Investigating Officer for zimma, the Court directed that the petitioner apply before the Investigating Officer, who would consider the request in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not granted direct release by the Court and was required to pursue provisional release before the Investigating Officer under Section 67(6) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.