Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an order passed under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 could be rectified by invoking Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the impugned rectification order was sustainable.
Analysis: The rectification order sought to amend an order originally passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under the scheme of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020. The scheme itself did not confer any power of rectification, and Section 5(3) declared the amount determined and the order passed under the scheme to be final and conclusive. The provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were not made applicable to that scheme. On that basis, the invocation of Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was held to be contrary to the governing statute.
Conclusion: The rectification order was without authority under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 and was liable to be quashed and set aside.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded, and the impugned rectification order was annulled.
Ratio Decidendi: An order passed under a settlement scheme that is declared final and conclusive cannot be rectified by invoking the general rectification provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961 unless the scheme itself expressly applies that provision.