Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit was admissible on outward transportation, courier and insurance services where the goods were sold on FOR destination basis and the buyers' premises constituted the place of removal.
Analysis: The disputed credit turned on the determination of the place of removal. The record indicated that the supplies were on FOR destination basis, the freight formed part of the invoice, and the risk remained with the assessee until delivery at the buyers' premises. In such circumstances, outward transportation and insurance services used for movement of goods up to the place of removal were eligible for credit. Courier service used for despatch of goods was also treated as an input service connected with manufacture and clearance. The Tribunal applied the existing coordinate Bench and Larger Bench view and found no higher-court reversal of that position.
Conclusion: The credit could not be denied; the appeal succeeded in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned denial of CENVAT credit was set aside and the assessee was held entitled to the disputed credit, with the matter effectively concluded in its favour.
Ratio Decidendi: Where clearance is on FOR destination basis and the buyers' premises is the place of removal, CENVAT credit on services used for transport and delivery up to that point is admissible as input service credit.