Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether addition under section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be sustained on cash deposits made during the demonetization period when the cash sales were recorded in the books, the books were not rejected, and no specific defect was pointed out merely because no stock register was maintained.
Analysis: Section 69A applies only where money found with the assessee is not recorded in the books and the explanation offered is unsatisfactory. The assessee produced cash book, sales register, purchase register, VAT/GST records, audited accounts and related documents showing that the cash deposits were linked to recorded business receipts. The books of account were never rejected under section 145(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and no specific defect in the cash book, sales register or purchase register was established. Absence of a stock register by itself, particularly in a jewellery business, does not render the accounts defective or justify treating recorded cash sales as unexplained money.
Conclusion: The addition under section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was not sustainable and was deleted.
Ratio Decidendi: Recorded cash sales supported by maintained books and accepted business records cannot be taxed as unexplained money under section 69A merely because of higher cash deposits during demonetization, especially when the books are not rejected and no specific defect is proved.