Royalty on bandwidth payments: pre-2012 telecommunication remittances to a non-resident did not trigger withholding tax.

Payments for International Private Leased Circuit bandwidth and telecommunication facilities made to a non-resident were analysed under the royalty definition in section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The note states that Explanations 4 to 6, inserted by the Finance Act, 2012, enlarged the charging provision and operated prospectively from 01.04.2012, so they could not govern earlier assessment years. On that basis, such service payments were not treated as royalty for the relevant period; in the absence of taxability in India or a taxable business connection or permanent establishment, no withholding obligation under section 195 arose, and consequential proceedings under sections 201, 201(1A) and 40(a)(i) were unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether payments made for International Private Leased Circuit bandwidth and telecommunication facilities to a non-resident constituted royalty taxable in India, so as to attract deduction of tax at source and consequential disallowance and default proceedings.

Analysis: The remittance was for bandwidth and telecommunication services provided outside India. The definition of royalty in section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as expanded by Explanations 4 to 6 inserted by the Finance Act, 2012, was held to be an enlargement of the charging provision and not a mere clarification. That expansion was held to operate prospectively from 01.04.2012 and could not be applied to the assessment years in question. Since the amount did not constitute royalty and the non-resident had no taxable business connection or permanent establishment in India, the payment was not liable to tax in India. In the absence of taxability, the obligation to deduct tax at source under section 195 did not arise, and the consequential action under sections 201, 201(1A) and 40(a)(i) could not be sustained.

Conclusion: The payment was not royalty, no tax was deductible at source, and the consequential default and disallowance orders were unsustainable.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded and the revenue's additions and TDS-based consequences were set aside.

Ratio Decidendi: Explanations 4 to 6 to section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 are prospective enlargements of the definition of royalty, and payments for bandwidth/telecommunication services to a non-resident do not constitute royalty for the relevant pre-2012 periods, so no withholding obligation arises absent taxability in India.

---