Explained jewellery in search assessments accepted where gifts, purchases and family circumstances support reasonable possession.

Jewellery found during search was explained by affidavits, purchase invoices, bank withdrawals and family details showing gifts on ceremonial occasions and purchases from disclosed funds. The authorities' rejection of that explanation was found inconsistent with the surrounding facts and customary family possession of jewellery. CBDT guidance on seizure of jewellery supported acceptance of a reasonable quantity for family members, and the remaining jewellery was treated as explained on the material produced. The addition for unexplained jewellery was therefore deleted; the separate challenge to approval under section 153D was not adjudicated because it was not pressed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the addition made on account of unexplained jewellery was sustainable in light of the evidence of gifts, purchases, bank withdrawals and the CBDT instruction recognising reasonable possession of jewellery by family members.

Analysis: The jewellery found during search was explained through affidavits, purchase invoices, bank statements and family details showing gifts received on ceremonial occasions and jewellery purchased out of disclosed funds. The reasoning adopted by the authorities below was found inconsistent with the surrounding facts and the customary treatment of family jewellery. The CBDT instruction dealing with seizure of jewellery supported allowance of a reasonable quantity, and the excess, on the facts, was held to be explained by the material on record. The challenge to the approval under section 153D was not pressed and was therefore not adjudicated.

Conclusion: The addition for unexplained jewellery was deleted and the assessee succeeded on the substantive ground.

Final Conclusion: The assessment addition relating to jewellery did not survive judicial scrutiny, and the appeal was allowed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where jewellery found during search is supported by credible evidence of gifts, purchases and family circumstances, and the quantity is reasonable in light of accepted customs and the applicable administrative instruction, an addition for unexplained investment cannot be sustained merely on conjecture.

---