Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the conflict between earlier decisions on the character of dividend distribution tax and the applicability of treaty protection warranted reference to a Larger Bench.
Analysis: The appeals raised the question whether dividend distribution tax under section 115-O was to be treated as tax on the company's profits or as tax on dividend income of the shareholder for the purpose of the India-UK treaty. The order examined the prior line of authority, noted the contrary view taken in a later Division Bench decision, and recorded that the earlier Division Bench decision, as affirmed by the Supreme Court, and another Division Bench decision supported the view that the levy was on the company's profits and not on the shareholder's dividend income. In view of the apparent inconsistency between the co-ordinate Bench decisions, the issue was treated as requiring consideration by a Larger Bench.
Conclusion: The matter was referred to the Chief Justice for constitution of a Larger Bench to answer the formulated questions on the correctness of the later view and whether it was per incuriam.
Final Conclusion: No final adjudication on the tax liability or refund claim was rendered, as the order only directed reference of the controversy to a Larger Bench.
Ratio Decidendi: Where co-ordinate Bench decisions on a recurring tax question appear irreconcilable, the proper course is to refer the issue to a Larger Bench for authoritative determination.