Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was liable to pay additional income-tax under Section 115-O of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on amounts distributed or paid by way of dividend in view of the exemption contained in Section 50 of the Small Industries Development Bank of India Act, 1989.
Analysis: Section 50 of the Small Industries Development Bank of India Act, 1989 contains a non-obstante clause and grants immunity from income-tax and any other tax in respect of income, profits or gains derived or any amount received by the Bank. The charge under Section 115-O of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is on the domestic company declaring, distributing or paying dividend, but the provision is subject to its own scope and does not override the specific exemption enacted in Section 50. The introduction of Section 115R to deal with a similar exemption under the Unit Trust of India Act, 1963 shows that where Parliament intended to override a special exemption, it did so expressly. On a proper construction, the amounts distributed by the petitioner by way of dividend fell within the protected category of income, profits or gains derived, and the petitioner was outside the reach of Section 115-O.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not liable to pay additional income-tax under Section 115-O, and the tax paid under protest was refundable.