Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was vitiated for breach of the principles of natural justice on account of insufficient time to respond to the draft assessment order, non-disposal of the adjournment request, and denial of a personal hearing.
Analysis: The time granted for responding to the draft assessment order was only 2.5 days, which included a Saturday and a Sunday, though the proposed additions were substantial and the assessee sought further time. The request for adjournment was not dealt with and the final assessment order was passed directly. In these circumstances, the assessee was not afforded a fair and reasonable opportunity of being heard before the assessment was completed. The breach of natural justice justified interference in writ jurisdiction and made it inappropriate to drive the assessee to the alternate statutory remedy.
Conclusion: The assessment order was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration from the stage of the draft assessment order with an opportunity to respond and a personal hearing. The consequential demand and penalty notices were also quashed.