Section 10AA, PF/ESI due dates, bad debts and section 41(1) treatment examined with partial remand for fresh verification.

Deduction under section 10AA was denied for assessment year 2017-18 on EPCG, EOU and zone-to-zone sales because the assessee failed to prove export out of India and receipt of convertible foreign exchange; the disallowance was sustained. Employees' contribution to PF and ESI paid after the prescribed due date remained disallowable, as payment before return filing did not cure the default. Sundry balances written off were also disallowed for want of supporting evidence, while bad debts written off were allowed on the basis of book write-off. Amounts relating to patents were held outside section 41(1) because they did not reflect cessation of liability. For assessment year 2018-19, the section 10AA issue was remanded for fresh verification of revised Form 56F and related material.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether deduction under section 10AA was allowable for assessment year 2017-18 on EPCG, EOU and zone-to-zone sales without proof of export out of India and receipt of convertible foreign exchange; (ii) whether employees' contribution to PF and ESI deposited after the prescribed date but before return filing was allowable; (iii) whether sundry balances written off were allowable as deduction; (iv) whether bad debts written off were allowable; (v) whether the amount relating to patents was taxable as cessation of liability under section 41(1); (vi) whether the disallowance of deduction under section 10AA for assessment year 2018-19 required fresh consideration on the revised Form 56F and surrounding circumstances.

Issue (i): whether deduction under section 10AA was allowable for assessment year 2017-18 on EPCG, EOU and zone-to-zone sales without proof of export out of India and receipt of convertible foreign exchange.

Analysis: The claim was examined against the statutory definition of export applicable to a Special Economic Zone undertaking. The assessee failed to produce evidence that the relevant sales were exported out of India or that convertible foreign exchange was realised. The revised factual assertions were not supported by contemporaneous evidence, and the reliance on decisions dealing with different factual settings was found inapposite.

Conclusion: The deduction under section 10AA was not allowable and the disallowance was sustained.

Issue (ii): whether employees' contribution to PF and ESI deposited after the prescribed date but before return filing was allowable.

Analysis: The deposits were made beyond the extended grace period accepted in the record, and the governing law on employees' contribution required compliance with the statutory due date. The later payment before filing of the return did not cure the default.

Conclusion: The disallowance of employees' contribution to PF and ESI was sustained.

Issue (iii): whether sundry balances written off were allowable as deduction.

Analysis: The assessee did not substantiate the write-off with party-wise records, supporting documents, or proof of the underlying claims. In the absence of evidence establishing the nature and allowability of the loss, the claim was not accepted.

Conclusion: The disallowance of sundry balances written off was sustained.

Issue (iv): whether bad debts written off were allowable.

Analysis: The amounts were written off in the books as irrecoverable, and the governing principle is that such write-off, once reflected in the accounts, satisfies the statutory requirement. No contrary material was found to dislodge the claim.

Conclusion: The bad debts were allowable and the deletion of the addition was upheld.

Issue (v): whether the amount relating to patents was taxable as cessation of liability under section 41(1).

Analysis: The transaction represented acquisition of a capital asset in the form of patents and set-off entries in the books, not cessation of a trading liability. The ingredients of section 41(1) were therefore absent.

Conclusion: Section 41(1) was not attracted and the deletion of the addition was upheld.

Issue (vi): whether the disallowance of deduction under section 10AA for assessment year 2018-19 required fresh consideration on the revised Form 56F and surrounding circumstances.

Analysis: The assessee's revised Form 56F and the explanation regarding delayed verification of foreign exchange receipts were not examined by the lower authorities in the backdrop of the Covid-related circumstances. The matter required one more opportunity and fresh verification of the supporting material.

Conclusion: The disallowance was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication.

Final Conclusion: The appeals for assessment year 2017-18 were dismissed, the deletion of bad-debt and section 41(1) additions was maintained, the assessment year 2018-19 quantum issue was sent back for fresh consideration, and the penalty matter was treated as consequential.

---