Taxability disputes fall within the rate-of-duty exclusion, leaving High Court appeal under excise law not maintainable.

An appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was held not maintainable where the proposed substantial question of law concerned taxability of the transaction, because such a dispute falls within the exclusion in Section 35L(2) as a question relating to the rate of duty. The court treated the issue of whether the transaction amounted to sale of goods or service under the Finance Act, 1994 as a taxability question for assessment purposes, and therefore outside High Court appellate jurisdiction. The appeal was rejected on maintainability, with the matter lying, if at all, before the Supreme Court under Section 35L.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was maintainable when the proposed substantial question of law concerned the taxability of the transaction and, consequently, fell within the scope of Section 35L(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Analysis: Section 35G permits an appeal to the High Court only where the order of the Tribunal does not relate to questions having a relation to the rate of duty or the value of goods for assessment. Section 35L(2) enlarges that exclusion by providing that determination of taxability or excisability of goods for assessment is included within questions relating to the rate of duty. The issue raised in the appeal was whether the transaction amounted to sale of goods or service under the Finance Act, 1994, which was treated as a taxability question falling within the statutory exclusion. The cited precedents were applied to reinforce that such disputes lie in the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and not the High Court.

Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable under Section 35G and lay, if at all, under Section 35L before the Supreme Court; the appeal was rejected on the ground of maintainability.

Ratio Decidendi: A dispute that directly concerns taxability or excisability for assessment purposes is a question relating to the rate of duty and is excluded from High Court appellate jurisdiction under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

---