Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was required to comply with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement before obtaining appellate relief, and whether interference with the impugned order was warranted.
Analysis: The petitioner had not complied with the pre-deposit condition under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Court found no ground to interfere with the impugned order, but granted two months' time to make the pre-deposit in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The pre-deposit requirement was held to be mandatory, and interference with the impugned order was declined.