Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the moratorium under the personal insolvency resolution process had ceased so as to permit continuation of execution proceedings and attachment and sale of the judgment debtors' properties.
Analysis: Section 101 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was construed strictly on its plain language. The moratorium is time-bound and ceases on the earlier of two events, namely expiry of 180 days from admission of the application or the date of an order on the repayment plan under Section 114 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The provision does not contemplate extension of the moratorium beyond those contingencies. Once the moratorium ends, the statutory bar is lifted and ordinary creditor remedies revive. As the prescribed period had expired and no repayment plan order had been passed, there was no legal impediment to proceeding with the application.
Conclusion: The moratorium had ceased and the execution proceedings were maintainable. The properties, except the excluded property, were directed to be attached and sold, and the application was allowed.