Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment notice issued under section 148 and the consequent assessment were invalid for want of approval from the correct specified authority under section 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The reassessment was initiated for assessment year 2018-19, and the notice under section 148 was issued on 09.04.2022, i.e. after more than three years from the end of the relevant assessment year. For such cases, section 151(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 required prior approval of the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director General, or where not available, the Chief Commissioner or Director General. The approval in the present case had been obtained only from the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, who was not the prescribed authority for that time frame. The subsequent procedural framework under sections 147, 148, 148A and 149 did not cure this defect, and the assessment framed under section 147 read with section 144B remained dependent on valid assumption of jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The notice under section 148 and the reassessment order were vitiated for lack of valid sanction under section 151(ii), and the assessment was quashed in favour of the assessee.