Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition sustained as unexplained money could stand when the assessee was not supplied all adverse material relied upon by the Revenue and was denied cross-examination of the persons whose statements formed part of the basis for the addition.
Analysis: The addition rested on a ledger account found in the seized tally file of a searched party and on statements said to have been recorded from persons admitting to accommodation entries. Only the ledger copy was supplied to the assessee. The statements relied upon by the Revenue were not furnished, and the requested cross-examination was also not granted. In these circumstances, the assessee was not given a fair opportunity to confront and rebut the material used against it. An addition based on such unshared adverse material could not be sustained without following the requirements of natural justice.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee. The matter was set aside to the Assessing Officer for supplying all adverse material, affording cross-examination, and then deciding the issue afresh in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: An addition based on third-party material and statements cannot be sustained unless the assessee is supplied the adverse material and given a meaningful opportunity to cross-examine where such statements are relied upon.