Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's challenge to the deletion of additions and disallowance relating to payments made to members and the claim under section 80P(2)(d) was sustainable.
Analysis: The Tribunal found, on the material placed before it, that the payments towards sugarcane purchase price were made to members and not to nominal members. On that basis, the amount paid was treated as a distribution among members in the course of the co-operative activity, and the Tribunal found no reason to disturb the relief granted by the first appellate authority. The same factual position was held applicable to the subsequent assessment year as well, there being no distinguishing feature warranting a different view.
Conclusion: The Revenue's grounds were rejected and the relief granted by the first appellate authority was sustained.
Final Conclusion: The additions and disallowance deleted by the first appellate authority remained deleted, and both Revenue appeals failed.