Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rejection of the application for restoration of the company's name in the register was justified on the grounds that the company was allegedly inactive, had not shown sufficient proof of business operations, and had not made out a case for restoration under the statutory scheme.
Analysis: The application for restoration was examined in the context of the power to strike off and restore a company's name under the Companies Act, 2013. The record included balance sheets and other material relied upon to show that the company had assets and was carrying on business, while the objection from the Registrar proceeded on the basis of non-compliance and alleged absence of statutory filings. The impugned order was found to rest on a misappreciation of the material and a vague conclusion that the company was not operational. The statutory approach to restoration was treated as one that should favour revival where the circumstances and documents support continuation of the company's existence and operations.
Conclusion: The refusal to restore the company's name was set aside and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh consideration of the restoration application in accordance with law.