Pre-existing dispute under insolvency law requires a complete record; rejection of the section 9 application was remanded for fresh adjudication.

An order rejecting a section 9 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code application on the basis of an alleged pre-existing dispute could not be sustained where the key materials relied on, including a prior communication and lab test report, were absent from the appellate record. Without those documents, the finding on dispute and the dismissal of the insolvency petition lacked a complete factual foundation. The proper course was remand for fresh adjudication after hearing both sides and considering the full record. The insolvency petition was therefore revived for reconsideration by the Adjudicating Authority.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the impugned order rejecting the section 9 application was unsustainable for want of proper reasoning and consideration of the record; (ii) whether the matter required remand because the documents relied upon to establish a pre-existing dispute were not on record.

Issue (i): Whether the impugned order rejecting the section 9 application was unsustainable for want of proper reasoning and consideration of the record.

Analysis: The application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 had been rejected on the basis of an alleged pre-existing dispute regarding quality of goods and communications said to have been made between the parties. The appellate record showed that the Adjudicating Authority's disposal was brief and relied on materials such as a communication dated 14.08.2023 and a lab test report, but those documents were not available in the appellate record. In these circumstances, the validity of the dismissal could not be tested on a complete factual foundation, and the order could not be sustained as a final determination on the dispute.

Conclusion: The rejection order was held unsustainable and was set aside.

Issue (ii): Whether the matter required remand because the documents relied upon to establish a pre-existing dispute were not on record.

Analysis: The appellate forum noted that the alleged prior communication and the lab test report, both central to the finding of pre-existing dispute, were not part of the record before it. Since the dispute could not be finally adjudicated without those materials, the proper course was to restore the petition and permit a fresh decision after hearing both sides and considering the complete record.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for a fresh reasoned order.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded to the extent that the impugned rejection was set aside and the insolvency petition was revived for reconsideration by the Adjudicating Authority.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the materials forming the basis of a finding on pre-existing dispute are absent from the record, the rejection of a section 9 insolvency application cannot be finally sustained and the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication on a complete record.

---