Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of section 50C, the stamp duty valuation as on the date of registration of the sale deeds or the stamp duty valuation as on the date of the agreement to sell should be adopted where the entire sale consideration had already been received through banking channels on the date of the agreement.
Analysis: The assessee transferred the lands under an agreement to sell executed on 31.12.2007 and received the entire consideration through banking channels on that date, while the sale deeds were registered later in January and February 2008. On these facts, the relevant valuation date for section 50C was held to be the date of the agreement to sell, not the later registration date. The amendment to section 50C was treated as curative in nature, and the valuation on the date of registration was held not to represent the full value of consideration for computation of capital gains in the assessee's hands.
Conclusion: The addition made by adopting the stamp valuation as on the registration date was deleted and the assessee succeeded on the section 50C issue.