Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proviso to section 50C(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 inserted by the Finance Act, 2016 applies retrospectively to pending matters and whether the stamp valuation on the date of agreement to sell could be adopted for computing capital gains where the agreement date and registration date are different.
Analysis: The dispute centred on the application of section 50C where the assessee had entered into an agreement to sell on one date and completed the transfer later. The Tribunal noted that the proviso to section 50C(1), inserted with effect from 01.04.2017, permits adoption of the stamp valuation on the date of agreement when the agreement date and registration date are not the same. Relying on earlier Tribunal decisions, it held that the amendment is curative and clarificatory in nature and therefore applicable to pending matters. The Tribunal accepted the assessee's contention in principle and held that the valuation on the agreement date should be considered for computing the full value of consideration, subject to verification of facts by the Assessing Officer.
Conclusion: The proviso to section 50C(1) was held to apply retrospectively in principle, and the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer to verify the facts and recompute the capital gain by adopting the circle rate on the date of the agreement to sell.
Ratio Decidendi: A curative or clarificatory amendment to section 50C(1) permitting adoption of the stamp valuation on the agreement date, where the agreement and registration dates differ, applies to pending proceedings and governs computation of the full value of consideration.