Invalid reassessment for defective recorded reasons and lack of independent belief of income escapement

Reassessment was invalid where the recorded reasons failed to identify the specific share transaction or scrip and appeared to rely mainly on investigation wing inputs without an independent basis for belief of escapement of income. The reasons also incorrectly stated that no return had been filed, although the return and computation disclosing exempt long-term capital gain were already on record. On these facts, the reopening showed no proper application of mind and could not sustain the reassessment, which was quashed in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the reassessment proceedings initiated under section 147/148 were valid in law on the basis of the recorded reasons and whether the impugned reassessment could be sustained.

Analysis: The recorded reasons were found to be materially deficient because they did not clearly disclose the nature of the impugned share transaction or the specific scrip involved and appeared to rest mainly on investigation wing information. The reasons also incorrectly stated that the assessee had not filed a return for the relevant assessment year, although the return and computation showing exempt long-term capital gain were on record. On the facts, the reassessment was held to have been initiated without proper application of mind and without a sustainable independent basis for forming the requisite belief of escapement of income.

Conclusion: The reassessment under sections 147 and 148 was held to be invalid, and the reassessment order was quashed in favour of the assessee.

---