Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Select multiple courts at once.
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Statutory cap on condonation of delay barred an insolvency appeal filed far beyond the maximum permissible period.</h1> Under Section 62(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, delay in filing an appeal can be condoned only within the prescribed 45-day period plus a ... Statutory cap on condonation of delay - delay of 253 days - Maintainability of appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. - HELD THAT: - The Court held that under Section 62(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, delay can be condoned only up to 15 days beyond the prescribed period of 45 days, if the Court is satisfied. Since the reported delay of 253 days was far beyond that outer statutory limit, the appeal was not entertainable. [Paras 1, 2] The appeal was dismissed as barred by limitation on the ground that the delay exceeded the statutorily condonable period. Final Conclusion: The Court dismissed the appeal on the ground of delay, holding that the reported delay was far beyond the maximum period that could be condoned under Section 62(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Outcome: Appeal dismissed on the ground of delay.