State tax first charge does not override insolvency waterfall; tax department need not be treated as a secured creditor.

A commercial tax department's claim under a State tax law first charge provision was held not to require treatment as a secured creditor when tested against the insolvency distribution framework. Applying earlier Tribunal reasoning on similar State VAT first charge provisions, the analysis concluded that such tax priority clauses do not displace the insolvency waterfall or compel secured-creditor status in a resolution plan. The challenge to the plan therefore failed, and the treatment of the tax department as an operational creditor was left undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the commercial tax department could be treated as a secured creditor on the basis of the first charge provision in the State tax law, and whether the resolution plan approval treating it as an operational creditor required interference.

Analysis: The dispute was covered by an earlier decision of the Tribunal dealing with similar first charge provisions under the State VAT law. The Tribunal applied the earlier reasoning that such State tax provisions, when tested against the insolvency distribution framework, do not compel treatment of the tax department as a secured creditor in the resolution plan. The cited authorities on priority of dues and the insolvency waterfall were relied upon to hold that the appellant's claim did not warrant a different result.

Conclusion: The appellant's challenge failed, and the resolution plan treating the tax department as an operational creditor was not interfered with.

---