Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of Rs.16,90,000 made under Section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as unexplained cash deposits is sustainable where the assessee claims the deposits are proceeds from sale of agricultural produce and the Revenue has not produced evidence of any other undisclosed source nor conducted independent inquiry.
Analysis: The assessee asserted that the bank deposits originated from sale of agricultural produce. The assessing officer made an addition under Section 69A on the ground that the assessee failed to prove the source. On appeal the Revenue relied on absence of an "agricultural income certificate" from a concerned authority but did not produce evidence of any alternate undisclosed source of income nor conduct independent verification. The Tribunal examined whether the Revenue met its evidentiary burden to establish that the deposits were unexplained income and whether non-production of a formal certificate, in the circumstances, was a valid basis to sustain the addition.
Conclusion: The addition of Rs.16,90,000 under Section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is deleted and the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee offers a plausible explanation that deposits arise from agricultural income and the Revenue fails to produce evidence of an undisclosed source or to carry out independent inquiry, an addition under Section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 cannot be sustained.