Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether notices and order issued under sections 148A(b), 148A(d) and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2013-14 are barred by limitation under the first proviso to section 149(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Section 149(1)(b) as amended provides a ten-year window for issuing reassessment notices subject to the first proviso which restricts retrospective application for assessment years beginning on or before 01.04.2021. The first proviso preserves the survival of the pre-amendment time limit (six years) for those assessment years; consequently, a notice for such past years is permissible under the new regime only if the time limit under the old regime remained extant. Applying the surviving-period principle established by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal, the last date on which a valid notice could have been issued for AY 2013-14 was 30.06.2021. The impugned notices and order dated 19.03.2024 and 04.04.2024 fall beyond that surviving period and thus do not satisfy the proviso's temporal requirement.
Conclusion: The notices dated 19.03.2024 and 04.04.2024 and the order dated 04.04.2024 are barred by limitation under the first proviso to section 149(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and are quashed and set aside; subsequent proceedings consequent thereto are also quashed.