TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether proceedings under Section 74 of the CGST Act are independent of action taken under Section 67 of the CGST Act; (ii) Whether material collected during an allegedly illegal search and seizure can be relied upon in proceedings under Section 74 of the CGST Act if it is relevant; (iii) Whether the proper officer may rely upon material gathered by officers of another Commissionerate and whether writ interference with the show cause notice at the threshold is warranted.
Issue (i): Whether proceedings under Section 74 of the CGST Act are independent of action taken under Section 67 of the CGST Act.
Analysis: Section 74 creates a self-contained adjudicatory scheme for cases of tax not paid, short paid, erroneous refund, or wrongful availment of input tax credit. Its initiation is not made conditional upon a prior or valid action under Section 67. The statutory text does not make the exercise of power under Section 74 dependent on the outcome or legality of inspection, search, or seizure proceedings under Section 67.
Conclusion: The proceedings under Section 74 are independent and are not contingent upon action under Section 67.
Issue (ii): Whether material collected during an allegedly illegal search and seizure can be relied upon in proceedings under Section 74 of the CGST Act if it is relevant.
Analysis: The governing principle is that relevancy, not the source of collection alone, determines whether material may be used in adjudicatory proceedings, unless the statute expressly excludes such use. Neither Section 67 nor Section 74 contains an express or implied prohibition against relying on material gathered in search and seizure proceedings. The Court applied the settled rule that illegally obtained evidence is not excluded merely for that reason if it remains relevant to the controversy and is subjected to adjudication in accordance with law.
Conclusion: Such material is not inadmissible merely because the search is alleged to be illegal, provided the material is relevant to the proceedings under Section 74.
Issue (iii): Whether the proper officer may rely upon material gathered by officers of another Commissionerate and whether writ interference with the show cause notice at the threshold is warranted.
Analysis: The statutory scheme permits the proper officer to act on material available in his possession, and the source of that material is not restricted to his own territorial investigation. Material collected by another Commissionerate may be forwarded and used if it bears on the alleged evasion and is furnished to the noticee for reply. Since the noticee has an opportunity to contest relevancy and admissibility in adjudication, interference at the stage of the show cause notice was considered premature.
Conclusion: The proper officer may rely on material gathered by another Commissionerate, and threshold writ interference with the show cause notice is unwarranted.
Final Conclusion: The appellate court restored the show cause notice, held that the adjudicatory process under Section 74 could continue on the basis of the material collected, and left the parties to contest the merits before the proper officer.
Ratio Decidendi: In proceedings under Section 74 of the CGST Act, the decisive consideration is the relevancy of material available to the proper officer, and not whether such material originated from a search alleged to be illegal or from an officer of another Commissionerate, unless the statute expressly prohibits its use.
TaxTMI 
