Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applies to a partnership firm so as to tax the difference between circle rate and purchase price as income.
Analysis: Section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) expressly refers to individuals and Hindu Undivided Families. The text of the provision does not extend its operation to partnership firms. Applying purposive construction to the statutory language and the class of persons specified, the provision cannot be invoked to assess a partnership firm for the differential between circle rate and consideration. Coordinate authority adopting similar reasoning is available and may be followed.
Conclusion: Section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 does not apply to a partnership firm; the addition made under that provision is deleted and the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A tax provision confined by its language to specified classes of taxpayers (individuals and HUFs) cannot be applied to a partnership firm; therefore section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is not applicable to partnership firms.