Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the addition of Rs. 2,18,61,14,060/- for difference in turnover (GSTR-1 vs profit and loss account) was rightly deleted by the CIT(A); (ii) Whether the addition of Rs. 26,06,30,847/- under Section 56 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for notional interest on service concession receivable and deferred retention liability was rightly deleted by the CIT(A).
Issue (i): Whether the addition of Rs. 2,18,61,14,060/- on account of difference in turnover should be sustained.
Analysis: The assessee produced confirmations, Form 26AS entries and bank credits showing milestone payments were received and accounted in financial years 2017-18 and 2018-19; these documents were submitted as additional evidence during remand proceedings and the Assessing Officer, in his remand report, recorded that the discrepancy arose from invoices related to FY 2017-18 and 2018-19. The CIT(A) examined the accounting treatment under IND-AS and the documentary reconciliation between GSTR-1 and books and concluded that the amounts related to earlier years and could not be taxed again in the assessment year under consideration.
Conclusion: The deletion of the addition of Rs. 2,18,61,14,060/- is upheld in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the addition of Rs. 26,06,30,847/- under Section 56 for notional interest ought to be sustained.
Analysis: The assessee had credited notional interest to profit and loss account in compliance with IND-AS using the effective interest method and reduced the same in computation of income. The CIT(A) evaluated IND-AS treatment, noted that the interest became payable only after commercial operation date and that actual interest was offered to tax in subsequent assessment years; assessing officers in later years accepted the assessee's position. On these facts the CIT(A) deleted the addition and directed deletion by the AO.
Conclusion: The deletion of the addition of Rs. 26,06,30,847/- under Section 56 is upheld in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal is dismissed on both substantive issues, confirming acceptance of the assessee's reconciliatory additional evidence and IND-AS based accounting treatment for notional interest.
Ratio Decidendi: Where documentary evidence and remand report reconcile differences between GST records and books showing earlier-year receipt and where notional interest is recognized under IND-AS and actual interest is taxed in subsequent years, additions for turnover discrepancy and notional interest cannot be sustained in the impugned assessment year.