Corroboration of Third Party Evidence: addition deleted where no direct documentary link or opportunity to cross examine deponents was provided.

Addition of unexplained cash raised from third party pen drive entries and statements recovered in a search was examined for sufficiency and corroboration; the Tribunal applied the principle that where the assessee denies a payment the revenue must produce independent corroborative material and afford opportunity to confront or cross examine the declarants. Because no vouchers, receipts or any document directly linking the assessee to the cash were found and no cross examination of relied upon deponents was allowed, the Tribunal deleted the addition and allowed the appeal in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the addition of Rs.10,00,000/- as unaccounted cash under Section 69 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, based on pen drive/excel sheets and third party statements recovered in a search (Section 132) and assessed under Section 153C, is sustainable where no incriminating documentary evidence directly connected to the assessee was found and no opportunity for cross examination of deponents was afforded.

Analysis: The Tribunal examined the material relied upon by the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner (Appeals), including the pen drive entries, statements of third party employees and promoter, and the assessment record. It noted that no cash vouchers, receipts, ledgers or any document signed by the assessee linking her to the alleged cash payment were found during search or post search proceedings. The Tribunal considered decisions of coordinate benches and higher authorities addressing additions founded solely on third party materials and digital records recovered from third parties, and the legal requirement that where an assessee denies the payment, the revenue must corroborate such third party evidence and afford the assessee an opportunity to confront or cross examine the deponents. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer did not bring on record independent corroborative material nor adequately furnished or confronted the accused material in the assessment order, and that no opportunity for cross examination of the persons whose statements were relied upon was provided.

Conclusion: The addition of Rs.10,00,000/- is deleted; the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.

---