Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of alleged on-money was sustainable when it was based on material found in a third party search, without confronting the adverse material to the assessee and without providing cross-examination of the persons whose statements were relied upon.
Analysis: The addition rested on a pendrive, Excel data and statements recorded during the search in the case of the builder group. The assessee denied any cash payment and maintained that the entire consideration was paid through banking channels. The material relied upon was not found from the assessee's possession, the assessee was not furnished the adverse documents or full statements, and the persons whose statements were relied upon were not produced for cross-examination. In the absence of corroborative evidence linking the assessee to any unaccounted cash payment, the third-party material could not be treated as credible evidence against the assessee. The electronic material was also not shown to have been duly proved in the manner required for admissibility of electronic evidence.
Conclusion: The addition on account of alleged on-money was not sustainable and was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: An addition based solely on third-party search material and statements cannot be sustained unless the material is confronted to the assessee, corroborated by independent evidence, and tested by allowing cross-examination where relied upon.