Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 issued in the name of a dissolved partnership firm is valid and whether reassessment proceedings initiated thereunder are maintainable.
Analysis: The assessee produced documents evidencing dissolution of the partnership firm and intimation of takeover and PAN surrender which were on record with the income tax authorities prior to issuance of notice under section 148. The reassessment notice was issued in the name of the dissolved firm after those intimations had been received. Judicial precedents addressing substitution of successor entities and effect of dissolution on jurisdiction were relied upon. Applying the statutory scheme for initiation of reassessment and the factual matrix showing the department's prior knowledge of dissolution and takeover, the notice issued in the name of the non-existent entity lacked legal foundation.
Conclusion: The notice under section 148 issued in the name of the dissolved partnership firm is bad in law and the reassessment proceedings initiated thereunder are quashed; decision is in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessing authority has been duly informed and has record of dissolution of an assessee entity and its successor, a notice under section 148 issued in the name of the dissolved entity is invalid and the consequent reassessment proceedings can be quashed.