Genuineness of credits under Section 68: banked advances repaid within the year and documentary proof sustain genuineness.

The note addresses treatment of receipts as unexplained credits under Section 68, holding that credits received as banked advances against specific purchase orders, supported by PAN, ITRs, financials, confirmations, purchase orders, cancellation letters and bank statements, and repaid by bank transfer within the same financial year, satisfied the statutory standard of genuineness. The analysis distinguishes genuine repaid banked advances from accommodation entries (one sided unrecouped inflows with commission). Operatively, the addition under Section 68 in respect of the contested receipts was found unsustainable and the assessment disallowed in favour of the taxpayer.

---

---

Issues: Whether additions of Rs.25,00,000 and Rs.75,000 made under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 treating amounts received from two entities as accommodation entries can be sustained where (i) advances were received through banking channels against purchase orders, (ii) purchase orders were subsequently cancelled and advances were repaid within the same financial year, and (iii) the assessee produced documents to prove identity, creditworthiness and genuineness.

Analysis: The assessed receipts comprised two advances of Rs.12,50,000 each received through banking channels against specific purchase orders and supported by purchase orders and bank statements. The purchase orders were subsequently cancelled and the advances were repaid to the respective parties by bank transfers within a period of about three to four months, within the same financial year. The assessee furnished PAN details, income-tax returns, financial statements, confirmations, purchase orders, cancellation letters and bank statements. Accommodation entries, as a mode of converting unaccounted cash, typically involve one-sided banking inflows not repaid to the purported creditors and involve commission to entry providers. In the present facts the payments were repaid and documentary evidence satisfied the conditions for treating the credits as genuine under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Conclusion: Addition under Section 68 in respect of Rs.25,00,000 is not sustainable and the Revenue's appeal is dismissed; the decision is in favour of the assessee.

---