Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the petitioner was entitled to provisional release of the imported boat on furnishing specified cash security and a bond for the balance differential duty pending final determination of classification and applicability of Indo Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement (ISFTA) benefits.
Analysis: The Court noted that the substantive question regarding classification and applicability of ISFTA benefits was pending consideration by the designated authority and that if proper classification entitled the petitioner to ISFTA benefits, exemption and refund could follow. In the interim, the Court examined whether adequate security had been furnished for the differential duty computed by the authorities. The petitioner had already deposited Rs. 8,04,303 and expressed willingness to deposit Rs. 75,00,000 in cash and to furnish a bond undertaking payment of any remaining liability. The Court treated such deposits and the proposed bond as sufficient security for the differential duty pending final adjudication, and recognised the recoverability of any additional liability in accordance with the relevant statutory scheme.
Conclusion: The petitioner is entitled to provisional release of the boat on deposit of Rs. 75,00,000 in cash (in addition to the Rs. 8,04,303 already deposited) and on furnishing a bond for the balance differential duty; all contentions on classification and ISFTA applicability are kept open for decision by the designated officer.