Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the penalty of Rs. 20,000/- levied under section 272A(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for failure to comply with notices under section 142(1) is sustainable, and whether the assessee established a reasonable cause under section 273B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for non-compliance.
Analysis: The facts show non-compliance with notices dated 28.08.2023 and 07.02.2024 and continued non-response during penalty proceedings, leading to a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- per default under section 272A(1)(d). The assessee relied on a medical certificate dated 14.09.2024 asserting that his mother required assistance for daily living; however, the certificate post-dates the relevant notice period and no contemporaneous medical evidence was produced for the period of non-compliance. The assessee's assertion of incapacity to respond is further weighed against evidence of substantial online gaming income in the same year and an uncorroborated claim that gaming was conducted by a third party. The statutory test under section 273B requires establishment of reasonable cause for non-compliance by contemporaneous or convincing evidence; in the absence of such evidence and given repeated non-compliance during penalty proceedings, the statutory preconditions for relief under section 273B are not met.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 272A(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is upheld; the assessee failed to establish reasonable cause under section 273B and the penalty of Rs. 20,000/- is sustainable against the assessee.