Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the assessee's activities of designing, financing, implementing, commissioning, operating and maintaining an energy-efficient public LED street lighting system for roads and highways in Jaipur constitute development of an "infrastructure facility" within the meaning of section 80IA(4)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, entitling the assessee to deduction under that provision.
Analysis: The assessee is a company registered in India and had entered into an Energy Performance Contract with Jaipur Municipal Corporation dated 24.12.2014 and evidenced Capital Work-in-Progress prior to 01.04.2017, satisfying conditions under clauses (a) to (c) of section 80IA(4)(i). The Explanation to section 80IA(4)(i) includes a "road" and a "highway project including other activities being an integral part of the highway project" within "infrastructure facility". The statutory term "road" is undefined in the Income-tax Act; a purposive and contextual interpretation is therefore appropriate. The contract obligations - design, finance, implementation, commissioning, long-term operation and maintenance, performance guarantees, deployment of technical manpower and compensation linked to energy savings - go beyond mere supply-and-installation and demonstrate entrepreneurial risk and long-term operational responsibility. Modern road/highway infrastructure encompasses functional components such as lighting, monitoring and automation which render roads usable and safe; such components qualify as activities integral to a highway/road project. The proviso excluding works contracts does not apply where the undertaking operates on a design-build-finance-operate-maintain basis with financial and performance risk, indicating developer status rather than mere contractor status.
Conclusion: The assessee's activities qualify as development of an "infrastructure facility" within the meaning of section 80IA(4)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; the assessee is therefore eligible for the deduction claimed and the disallowance of Rs. 7,16,84,974/- is deleted.