TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner should be permitted to challenge the impugned order dated 15.10.2025 before the Appellate Authority and on what conditions, having regard to alleged liquidation of the supplier and pending proceedings before the National Company Law Tribunal and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India grievance forum.
Analysis: The impugned order confirmed part of the demand under the GST proceedings. The petitioner asserts that input tax credit was taken based on supplier invoices and that the supplier was under liquidation, with liquidation approved by the National Company Law Tribunal and a complaint pending under Regulation 3(3) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Grievance and Complaint Handling Procedure) Regulations, 2017. The petition was filed within the period available for filing an appeal to the Appellate Authority. Given the existence of related proceedings before the NCLT and the grievance forum, the appropriate recourse is to allow the statutory appellate remedy to be pursued, subject to the statutory pre-deposit requirement, and to permit the Appellate Authority to take any favourable orders from the NCLT into account at final disposal.
Conclusion: The petitioner is granted liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority subject to depositing 10% of the disputed tax as pre-deposit within thirty days from receipt of the order; the Appellate Authority shall consider any favourable order obtained from the NCLT at the time of final disposal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
