Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the impugned GST order dated 30.06.2025 directing reversal of input tax credit should be interfered with.
Analysis: The petitioner filed a reply in Form GST DRC-06 stating an alleged reversal of CGST and SGST from the credit ledger; the petitioner later explained this as a typographical error and asserted that input tax credit was availed correctly after verification of the supplier's GST credentials. The record shows a pre-deposit of 25% of the disputed tax; the respondent could not confirm that. Considering the submissions and the record, no grounds to interfere with the impugned order were found, while permitting the petitioner to pursue statutory appellate remedy subject to stipulated pre-deposit and related conditions.
Conclusion: The impugned order dated 30.06.2025 is not interfered with; liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority within 30 days together with pre-deposit of 50% of the disputed tax (cash or from electronic cash register); any amount already recovered or paid shall be adjusted towards the 50% pre-deposit subject to verification; on compliance, the bank attachment shall stand vacated and the Appellate Authority shall dispose of the appeal without reference to limitation.